Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

Stable AIB PoC - Level down performance analysis for linux #26

Open
mhdawson opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Stable AIB PoC - Level down performance analysis for linux #26

mhdawson opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jul 21, 2016

See #25 for similar runs/data on windows

Steps followed:

  • Clone node and leveldown from https://github.com/ianwjhalliday/
  • npm install in leveldown
    • cd leveldown
    • npm install
  • Checkout api-opaque-prototype on node
  • Build node x64 release
  • For Master and api-opaque-prototype branches:
    • Checkout branch to be tested
    • Build leveldown x64 release
      • npm run rebuild --nodedir=/home/mhdawson/api-perf/node
    • Ensure debug builds do not exist
    • Run leveldown benchmarks including required cleanup (3 times)
      • rm -rf *.db
      • time node bench/db-bench.js
      • time node bench/write-random.js
      • time node bench/write-sorted.js
    • Time running the test suite
      • time node node_modules/tape/bin/tape test/*-test.js

Summary:

The differences in the benchmarks are quite small, and we probably need to do more to reduce variation on the machine and do more runs to consider the deltas valid.

Don't have times for running the tests as there is a failure in the ABI mode.

Perf Test leveldown-v8 leveldown-napi Delta
db-bench.js 72.67 sec 75 sec +3.21 %
write-random.js 193 sec 195.7 sec +1.4%
write-sorted.js 119.3 sec 117.67 sec -1.37%
tests - - -%
@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Jul 21, 2016
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Jul 21, 2016

OS and CPU info for machine:

bash-4.2$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2 (Maipo)
bash-4.2$ uname -a
Linux drx-hemera 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Apr 8 05:09:53 EDT 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
processor       : 119
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 62
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8880 v2 @ 2.50GHz
stepping        : 7
microcode       : 0x70d
cpu MHz         : 1712.597
cache size      : 38400 KB
physical id     : 3
siblings        : 30
core id         : 14
cpu cores       : 15
apicid          : 125
initial apicid  : 125
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms xsaveopt
bogomips        : 4996.44
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Believe it is 4 of these:
http://ark.intel.com/products/75257/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E7-8880-v2-37_5M-Cache-2_50-GHz
Its a big machine we have for perf tests.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

Base benchmark times, existing leveldown implementation

Wrote 1000000 entries in 70s, 110.62MB
Database size: 109M
Wrote 1000000 entries in 77s, 110.62MB
Database size: 110M
Wrote 1000000 entries in 71s, 110.62MB
Database size: 109M

Wrote 10000000 in 196s
Wrote times to ./write_random_times.csv
Database size: 389M
Wrote 10000000 in 194s
Wrote times to ./write_random_times.csv
Database size: 379M
Wrote 10000000 in 189s
Wrote times to ./write_random_times.csv
Database size: 385M

Wrote 10000000 in 121s
Wrote times to ./write_sorted_times.csv
Database size: 194M
Wrote 10000000 in 122s
Wrote times to ./write_sorted_times.csv
Database size: 194M
Wrote 10000000 in 115s
Wrote times to ./write_sorted_times.csv
Database size: 194M

Test times

real 0m7.912s
user 0m2.285s
sys 0m0.561s

real 0m7.819s
user 0m2.238s
sys 0m0.525s

real 0m7.889s
user 0m2.227s
sys 0m0.549s

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

Running into an error once I switch over to the napi version, will need to investigate.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

Despite error in tests benchmarks still ran:

Wrote 1000000 entries in 76s, 110.62MB
Database size: 110M
Wrote 1000000 entries in 75s, 110.62MB
Database size: 110M
Wrote 1000000 entries in 74s, 110.62MB
Database size: 110M

Wrote 10000000 in 192s
Wrote times to ./write_random_times.csv
Database size: 376M
Wrote 10000000 in 203s
Wrote times to ./write_random_times.csv
Database size: 389M
Wrote 10000000 in 192s
Wrote times to ./write_random_times.csv
Database size: 378M

Wrote 10000000 in 117s
Wrote times to ./write_sorted_times.csv
Database size: 194M
Wrote 10000000 in 119s
Wrote times to ./write_sorted_times.csv
Database size: 194M
Wrote 10000000 in 117s
Wrote times to ./write_sorted_times.csv
Database size: 194M

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

FYI - @ianwjhalliday

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant