From ccc6e75bea5b3d6e130f1897a9b3723d91124fa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:28:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] test: ensure nextTick is not scheduled in exit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Previously our tests did not check this codepath as seen at
coverage.nodejs.org

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9555
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
---
 test/parallel/test-next-tick-when-exiting.js | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/parallel/test-next-tick-when-exiting.js

diff --git a/test/parallel/test-next-tick-when-exiting.js b/test/parallel/test-next-tick-when-exiting.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..1bb4c914d01869
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/parallel/test-next-tick-when-exiting.js
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+'use strict';
+
+const common = require('../common');
+const assert = require('assert');
+
+process.on('exit', () => {
+  assert.strictEqual(process._exiting, true, 'process._exiting was not set!');
+
+  process.nextTick(() => {
+    common.fail('process is exiting, should not be called.');
+  });
+});
+
+process.exit();