Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding collaborators, Nov 2015 #354

Closed
mikeal opened this issue Nov 12, 2015 · 27 comments
Closed

adding collaborators, Nov 2015 #354

mikeal opened this issue Nov 12, 2015 · 27 comments

Comments

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Nov 12, 2015

Here's a list of recent contributors who are not yet collaborators. If there are no objections I'll be adding them to the Website WG.

@stevemao
Copy link
Contributor

I have no objections. I'm just wondering how many collaborators you need here?

Sent from my iPhone

On 13 Nov 2015, at 6:17 AM, Mikeal Rogers [email protected] wrote:

Here's a list of recent contributors who are not yet collaborators. If there are no objections I'll be adding them to the Website WG.

@sup commits
@kohei-takata commits
@ZibbyKeaton commits
@e-jigsaw commits
@jorangreef commits
@matthewloring commits
@nstanard commits
@woodyrew commits
@anseljh commits
@thephpjedi commits
@xcatliu commits
@Starefossen commits
@isaacs commits

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor Author

mikeal commented Nov 12, 2015

I'm just wondering how many collaborators you need here?

There's no real answer to this other than "more" while contributions are growing. Collaborators help with the sizable review load as we continue to gain more contributions (and we're not even near where we were on iojs.org for localizations yet).

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Nov 12, 2015

+1 to this. However, we need to be 100% sure they know the general rules - more specifically the merging/PR rules. In the past it's only been a few contributors added, and the older contributors were able to confirm over Issues. I'm sure you have opinions/thoughts on this, @mikeal?

@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

Do we want to go as far as having an onboarding?

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Nov 12, 2015

There's an upside and a downside to it.

Upside is that everybody knows what's going on, and there will be as few mistakes as possible.

Downside is that we have to put effort into it. That sounds extremely lazy, but it's the most simple way to describe it. We may not have enough/willing/able people to be able to onboard, and it will limit the rate at which we can accept new collaborators a lot.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 12, 2015

@bnb as for general rules - do you mean the contents of CONTRIBUTING.md?

@anseljh
Copy link
Contributor

anseljh commented Nov 12, 2015

I contributed exactly 2 bytes, so feel free to defer any onboarding or other work for me! 👍

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Nov 12, 2015

@sup Yes.

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Nov 12, 2015

@sup As well as GOVERNANCE.md

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 12, 2015

@bnb i see, thanks (as though, the GOVERNANCE.md is a bit outdated, isn't it?)

@phillipj
Copy link
Member

Nice @mikeal 👍

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 15, 2015

any progress on this? haven't heard from it in a while

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Nov 16, 2015

@sup I would add you, but I'm not a team maintainer (just checked). @fhemberger @snostorm or @therebelrobot, as well as @mikeal and maybe a few other Org owners can add you. I'd say we've got the +1 for at least @sup, and if anyone else from the list above expresses interest soon, we can add them too.

@matthewloring
Copy link
Contributor

@bnb I would be happy to become a collaborator as well.

@bnb
Copy link
Contributor

bnb commented Nov 17, 2015

@matthewloring Okay, just need another WG member to +1 you and you're set.

@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not a WG member, but +1 to @matthewloring

@xcatliu
Copy link
Contributor

xcatliu commented Nov 17, 2015

@bnb I'm ready to contribute to the website with you 😀

@fhemberger
Copy link
Contributor

@bnb Sorry, I've been quite busy lately, so I wasn't able to follow all the contributions which happened in the meantime. That's why I won't participate in the voting as well. Please just let me know who wants to become a contributor and got a +1, and I'll be happy to add them.

@kohei-takata
Copy link
Contributor

@bnb I want to be a collaborator!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 17, 2015

@fhemberger me, I suppose then

@fhemberger
Copy link
Contributor

@sup Just added you.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 17, 2015

@fhemberger thanks!

@Starefossen
Copy link
Member

I am already a part of Docker and Build working groups, so I probably don't need to become a collaborator here as well. I would like to contribute with more Docker stuff to the website however.

@phillipj
Copy link
Member

@fhemberger these three was mentioned and has expressed they want to be collaborators, could you add them aswell? ..and close the issue afterwards :)

@matthewloring @kohei-takata @xcatliu

@fhemberger
Copy link
Contributor

Unfortunately, GitHub has changed their user role management. Only organization owners can send invitations for new members to join (I can only add existing org members to the website team).

@Fishrock123 You're listed as owner, can you please add the new members?

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@fhemberger Invited all 3.

@phillipj
Copy link
Member

Closing this since the rest didn't respond.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests