Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
81 lines (67 loc) · 3.87 KB

2022-06-22.md

File metadata and controls

81 lines (67 loc) · 3.87 KB
Raw

Meeting from: June 22nd, 2022

Open RFC Meeting (npm)

Attendees

  • Darcy Clarke (@darcyclarke)
  • Gar (@wraithgar)
  • Jordan Harband (@ljharb)
  • Owen Buckley (@thescientist13)
  • Nathan Fritz (@fritzy)

Agenda

  1. Housekeeping
    1. Introduction(s)
    2. Code of Conduct Acknowledgement
    3. Outline Intentions & Desired Outcomes
    4. Announcements
  2. PR: #91 feat: feat(git): add support for :: in #committish - @wraithgar
  3. Issue: #519 BREAKING CHANGE(engines): engines support for npm9 - @lukekarrys
  4. PR: #5000 feat: add npm query cmd - @ruyadorno
  5. PR: #595 Propose backwards-compatible improvements to compression - @EvanHahn
  6. PR: #593 Only Registry Tarballs - @thescientist13
  7. PR: #591 RFC: Registry-scoped keyfile / certfile credential options - @jenseng
  8. Issue: #489 Initiative: `v8.x` - @darcyclarke
  9. Issue: #487 Initiative: `v10.x` - @darcyclarke
  10. PR: #564 RFC: Dependency Selector Syntax & `npm query` - @darcyclarke
  11. Issue: #443 Initiative: `v9.x` - @darcyclarke
  12. PR: #165 RFC for parent package.json - @Christian24

Notes

PR: #91 feat: feat(git): add support for :: in #committish - @wraithgar

  • @wraithgar
    • this was an old item we never got to
    • allows for support of reference patsh in git repos (good for monorepos)

Issue: #519 BREAKING CHANGE(engines): engines support for npm9 - @lukekarrys

  • @lukekarrys
    • want to reevalute our Node/engines support
    • odd versions seem like outliers to the current strategy
  • @wraithgar
    • difference between engines vs. support
    • engines is meant for "this should work in here"
  • @ljharb
    • should use @pkgjs/support create work
  • @darcyclarke

PR: #5000 feat: add npm query cmd - @ruyadorno

  • @wraithgar
    • is taking over the work, will have updates by next week

PR: #595 Propose backwards-compatible improvements to compression - @EvanHahn

  • @fritzy
    • @EvanHan is still investigating this

PR: #593 Only Registry Tarballs - @thescientist13

  • @thescientist13
    • has made several updates from discussions/feedback (ref. #593 (comment))
    • would like to discuss naming of flag again (ref. --only-registry-deps vs. current --only-non-remote-deps)
    • should we hold off until npm query is available?

PR: #591 RFC: Registry-scoped keyfile / certfile credential options - @jenseng

Issue: #489 Initiative: `v8.x` - @darcyclarke

Issue: #487 Initiative: `v10.x` - @darcyclarke

PR: #564 RFC: Dependency Selector Syntax & `npm query` - @darcyclarke

  1. Issue: #443 Initiative: `v9.x` - @darcyclarke
  2. PR: #165 RFC for parent package.json - @Christian24