You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is an issue with the RDF dumps of Meta, specifically in versions 1 through 5 (latest affected version: Version 5 available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21747536.v5). The problem lies with the publication dates of entities of type https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21747536.v5, i.e., bibliographic resources. It seems that, due to an unknown bug, these dates sometimes lack the proper datatype assignment.
Notably, when examining the same data within the triplestore, the publication dates correctly possess their datatype. This discrepancy suggests that the issue arises during the generation or export of the RDF dumps. The predicate for these dates is http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/publicationDate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is an issue with the RDF dumps of Meta, specifically in versions 1 through 5 (latest affected version: Version 5 available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21747536.v5). The problem lies with the publication dates of entities of type https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21747536.v5, i.e., bibliographic resources. It seems that, due to an unknown bug, these dates sometimes lack the proper datatype assignment.
Notably, when examining the same data within the triplestore, the publication dates correctly possess their datatype. This discrepancy suggests that the issue arises during the generation or export of the RDF dumps. The predicate for these dates is http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/publicationDate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: