Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support "period after opening" #815

Open
Tracked by #5505 ...
aleene opened this issue Apr 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Open
Tracked by #5505 ...

Support "period after opening" #815

aleene opened this issue Apr 30, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
API Issues related to the Open Food Facts API. More specific labels exist & should be used (API WRITE…) 🧴 Open Beauty Facts Our cosmetic analysis project https://world.openbeautyfacts.org question

Comments

@aleene
Copy link
Contributor

aleene commented Apr 30, 2017

The write api does not seem to support the period after opening field.

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Apr 30, 2017

periods_after_opening

<input type="text" name="periods_after_opening" id="periods_after_opening" class="text tagsinput" value="12 months 
" data-tagsinput-init="true" style="display: none;">

@teolemon teolemon added API Issues related to the Open Food Facts API. More specific labels exist & should be used (API WRITE…) 🧴 Open Beauty Facts Our cosmetic analysis project https://world.openbeautyfacts.org question labels Apr 30, 2017
@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented May 1, 2017

@aleene is this version working better ? That's the one in the web form.

@aleene
Copy link
Contributor Author

aleene commented May 1, 2017

No, that is the one I tried.

This was referenced Aug 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API Issues related to the Open Food Facts API. More specific labels exist & should be used (API WRITE…) 🧴 Open Beauty Facts Our cosmetic analysis project https://world.openbeautyfacts.org question
Projects
Status: To discuss and validate
Status: To be triaged
Status: To Discuss & Validate
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants