Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: chronovise: Measurement-Based Probabilistic Timing Analysis framework #675

Closed
whedon opened this issue Apr 13, 2018 · 20 comments

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Apr 13, 2018

Submitting author: @federeghe (FEDERICO REGHENZANI)
Repository: https://github.com/federeghe/chronovise
Version: v1.0
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @lkosmid

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @federeghe. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@federeghe if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Apr 13, 2018

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Apr 13, 2018

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Apr 13, 2018

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Apr 16, 2018

👋 @labarba - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

@danielskatz
Copy link

I can take this one

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Apr 22, 2018

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

@danielskatz
Copy link

@federeghe - please suggest potential reviewers. This list of people who have already agreed to review for JOSS may be candidates.

@federeghe
Copy link

Thank you, maybe @fritzo or @jordigh? According to the list, they are experts in C++ and statistics, not on real-time systems but it may be sufficient for the review.

@danielskatz
Copy link

@fritzo and @jordigh - would either or both of you be willing to review this submission?

@fritzo
Copy link

fritzo commented Apr 23, 2018

@danielskatz sorry I can't handle any additional reviews at the moment

@danielskatz
Copy link

FYI, I'm currently trying to find reviewers by email

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon assign @lkosmid as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 2, 2018

OK, the editor is @lkosmid

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon assign @lkosmid as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 2, 2018

OK, the reviewer is @lkosmid

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 2, 2018

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 2, 2018

OK, I've started the review over in #711. Feel free to close this issue now!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants