Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW]: COHESIVM: Combinatorial h+/e- Sample Investigation using Voltaic Measurements #7291

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
review Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @mxwalbert (Maximilian Wolf)
Repository: https://github.com/mxwalbert/cohesivm
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @RMeli
Reviewers: @ericfell, @enricgrau
Archive: Pending

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42b8ef67cb511833d81289249d273bd2"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42b8ef67cb511833d81289249d273bd2/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42b8ef67cb511833d81289249d273bd2/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42b8ef67cb511833d81289249d273bd2)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@ericfell & @enricgrau, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @RMeli know.

Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest

Checklists

@ericfell, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@enricgrau, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1002/anie.200603675 is OK
- 10.1039/D3MA00136A is OK
- 10.6028/jres.117.010 is OK
- 10.1063/5.0032116 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.06371 is OK
- 10.1080/08940886.2019.1608121 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Materials Acceleration Platform: Accelerating Adva...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bayesian Optimization of Spray Parameters for the ...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.10 s (1005.5 files/s, 287728.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              3             14              0          11151
Scheme                           2             26              0           9545
Python                          40           1022           1170           3917
Markdown                        20            217              0            742
reStructuredText                26            313            480            372
Jupyter Notebook                 4              0            326            113
TeX                              1              8              0             78
TOML                             1              4              2             51
Arduino Sketch                   1              5              0             50
YAML                             3              9             11             49
CSS                              1              7              0             38
INI                              2             13              0             27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           104           1638           1989          26133
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    29	mxwalbert
     3	selinawillswissen

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 407

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
review Track: 2 (BCM) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants