Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] Batch ingestion appears to reorder documents in response with failures #14336

Closed
andrross opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[BUG] Batch ingestion appears to reorder documents in response with failures #14336

andrross opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working Indexing Indexing, Bulk Indexing and anything related to indexing untriaged

Comments

@andrross
Copy link
Member

Describe the bug

Send two documents in a bulk request with batch_size set to 2 or larger. Configure the ingest processor to fail on the first document and succeed on the second. The response will show success for the document that failed, and vice versa. Set the batch size to 1 and the test will pass.

Related component

Indexing

To Reproduce

See #14335 for a failing integration test

Expected behavior

Tests in #14335 should pass

Additional Details

No response
@andrross andrross added bug Something isn't working untriaged labels Jun 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Indexing Indexing, Bulk Indexing and anything related to indexing label Jun 13, 2024
@andrross andrross mentioned this issue Jun 13, 2024
Closed
3 tasks
@chishui chishui mentioned this issue Jun 14, 2024
Merged
3 tasks
@chishui
Copy link
Contributor

chishui commented Jun 14, 2024

Fix PR: #14341

@andrross
Copy link
Member Author

Resolved by #14341

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working Indexing Indexing, Bulk Indexing and anything related to indexing untriaged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@chishui @andrross