You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please, consider render the areas tagged as landcover=trees.
This tag is useful to represent groups of urban trees and parks, but actually is not visible on the render.
Actually exist landuse=forest and natural=wood, but neither is applicable to urban areas. In the cities do not exist forestal explotations or woodlands.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This came up before on #4272 and we decided against it.
I don't think the landcover tags have gained any traction in the past 6 months, and adding a preset for it would only further fragment things.
Please, consider render the areas tagged as landcover=trees.
This tag is useful to represent groups of urban trees and parks, but actually is not visible on the render.
Actually exist landuse=forest and natural=wood, but neither is applicable to urban areas. In the cities do not exist forestal explotations or woodlands.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: