Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to alpine Docker base-image #318

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2019
Merged

Switch to alpine Docker base-image #318

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2019

Conversation

aeneasr
Copy link
Member

@aeneasr aeneasr commented Dec 17, 2019

Closes #312

@tleef
Copy link
Contributor

tleef commented Dec 18, 2019

Does this have a significant impact on the image size or cpu/memory usage at runtime? I'm asking because I like running oathkeeper as a sidecar container with my main service container. To me, the tiny footprint is a major feature.

I noticed that you have a separate Dockerfile-alpine for hydra. Maybe that could be the way to go here as well?

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member Author

aeneasr commented Dec 18, 2019 via email

@aeneasr
Copy link
Member Author

aeneasr commented Dec 18, 2019

Sorry, I didn't see the edit:

I noticed that you have a separate Dockerfile-alpine for hydra. Maybe that could be the way to go here as well?

Yes, that's absolutely right and I've updated the PR accordingly! :)

@aeneasr aeneasr merged commit 815951b into master Dec 18, 2019
@aeneasr aeneasr deleted the fix-312 branch December 18, 2019 11:02
pike1212 pushed a commit to pike1212/oathkeeper that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Replace the base image with alpine
2 participants