You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There has been a request to add back to our system the recognition of who entered most of the data and a suggested citation for the data download.
Part of this may be taken care of with our new data archiving system, but it still would be a good idea to acknowledge data enterers.
I think the best place for this might be the metadata block in a data download. While the metadata is EXTREMELY important, the first thing I always do is cut it out and save it elsewhere, because it gets in the way of using the data as a spreadsheet.
I think the way to fix these two issues is to download 2 files, with paired names. While we are messing with the downloader, let's force users to pick a name for the file(s), then download 2 files data and metadata with the given name plus the tags data and metadata.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There has been a request to add back to our system the recognition of who entered most of the data and a suggested citation for the data download.
Part of this may be taken care of with our new data archiving system, but it still would be a good idea to acknowledge data enterers.
I think the best place for this might be the metadata block in a data download. While the metadata is EXTREMELY important, the first thing I always do is cut it out and save it elsewhere, because it gets in the way of using the data as a spreadsheet.
I think the way to fix these two issues is to download 2 files, with paired names. While we are messing with the downloader, let's force users to pick a name for the file(s), then download 2 files data and metadata with the given name plus the tags data and metadata.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: