We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rpc method debug_traceBlockByNumber is broken on v1.0.4
v1.0.4
// Request { "method": "debug_traceBlockByNumber", "params":["0x114a730",{"tracer":"callTracer"}], "id": 1, "jsonrpc": "2.0" } // Response { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "error": { "code": -32003, "message": "max fee per gas less than block base fee" } }
v1.0.3 and below
debug_traceBlockByNumber
No response
Linux (x86)
reth Version: 1.0.4-dev Commit SHA: e24e4c7 Build Timestamp: 2024-08-06T19:26:05.400257125Z Build Features: asm_keccak,jemalloc,optimism Build Profile: maxperf
2
base/optimism
Archive (default)
cargo build --profile maxperf --features jemalloc,asm-keccak,optimism --locked --bin op-reth
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
possibly closed by #10210
Sorry, something went wrong.
this is fixed as of 1.0.5. Thank you
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
rpc method debug_traceBlockByNumber is broken on v1.0.4
v1.0.4
v1.0.3 and below
Steps to reproduce
debug_traceBlockByNumber
Node logs
No response
Platform(s)
Linux (x86)
What version/commit are you on?
reth Version: 1.0.4-dev
Commit SHA: e24e4c7
Build Timestamp: 2024-08-06T19:26:05.400257125Z
Build Features: asm_keccak,jemalloc,optimism
Build Profile: maxperf
What database version are you on?
2
Which chain / network are you on?
base/optimism
What type of node are you running?
Archive (default)
What prune config do you use, if any?
No response
If you've built Reth from source, provide the full command you used
cargo build --profile maxperf --features jemalloc,asm-keccak,optimism --locked --bin op-reth
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: