Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configurable block format #18

Open
liamaharon opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Configurable block format #18

liamaharon opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@liamaharon
Copy link
Contributor

See #6 (comment)

I'm unsure what the priority is at the moment, trying to gauge how common it is for parachains to use something other than node_primitives::Block.

@weichweich
Copy link

weichweich commented Sep 21, 2023

trying to gauge how common it is for parachains to use something other than node_primitives::Block.

Awesome project, looking forward to integrate this into KILTs release process!

Our Spiritnet uses a u64 as block number. So I would need to adjust the block definition.

But we also build our own tool that automates the release process a little more and tests some specific things for us as well. So I'm thinking to use this project rather as a dependency than a CLI tool. Which also looks easy enough to do thanks to the split in CLI and core. 🚀

@liamaharon liamaharon added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Sep 21, 2023
@liamaharon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome project, looking forward to integrate this into KILTs release process!

Thank you!

Our Spiritnet uses a u64 as block number. So I would need to adjust the block definition.

Got you. In the immediate term, you could fork the project and make necessary adjustments to the block format.

Medium term, it should be straight forward to adjust the inherent provider so that it also supports configuring the block format.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants