laser_acceleration_PICMI.py example not consistent with PICMI standard?

[RTSandberg]

The lower and upper r boundary conditions in RZ geometry are specified as None and 'reflective' but the standard only lists 'dirichlet', 'Neumann', and 'open' as possibilities. Should these be changed in the example to 'dirichlet' and something else? Or should the standard be expanded to allow 'reflective' and None?
Could warnings be issued for PICMI options that aren't in the standard?

[dpgrote]

Thanks for pointing this out. For the lower boundary, PICMI should be updated to include the option None (meaning the natural boundary condition at r=0).

For the upper boundary, I see that FBPIC supports the reflective option (and WarpX does not). @RemiLehe what is the reflective BC in FBPIC? Is it the same as Dirichlet?