Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exposing subsystem functionality controls in conf.toml #530

Open
4 tasks
goodboy opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks

Exposing subsystem functionality controls in conf.toml #530

goodboy opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@goodboy
Copy link
Contributor

goodboy commented Jul 13, 2023

Obviously related to both #529 and #221 we have a TON of stuff in many sub-systems that can be exposed for manual user control 😂

The latest example of this is from #523 which more or less allows user tweaking of the "scaling" of all widgets in our UIs by setting a font size..


Where to start

  • search for todo notes in the code base with:

    • git grep config.toml
    • git grep conf.toml
  • more or less off the top of my head (lul):

    • .data.feed. throttling controls (search for tick_throttle)
    • data.flows.Flume memory allocation size depending on OHLC sample rate
    • .service related (actor) daemon socket-address settings, maybe registry definitions?
      • for eg. defining the network transport layer addresses over multiple hosts 😎
    • .accounting._allocate settings for order sizing and limits
      • (maybe on a per asset type basis?)

Testing

  • add at least one validation test that ensures the minimal set
    of fields are present in the conf.toml file
  • ideally per subsystem functionality tests of some sort:
    • setting .data.feed throttle rate results in measurably
      limited tick rates.
    • set .data.history related ShmArray (buffer) mem size
      and make sure /dev/shm files are sized to match.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant