Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve the query performance on partition table #17474

Closed
zz-jason opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

improve the query performance on partition table #17474

zz-jason opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature/accepted This feature request is accepted by product managers invalid priority/P2 The issue has P2 priority. sig/execution SIG execution sig/planner SIG: Planner type/feature-request Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. type/performance

Comments

@zz-jason
Copy link
Member

zz-jason commented May 28, 2020

Description

We have supported the range and hash partition table since TiDB 3.0. Except for other unsupported partition features, the performance on the current implementation of the partition table still has some space to improve.

Scenarios that the performance can be improved:

See this google doc(in Chinese) for more detail.

Category

  • Performance

Value

Value Description

improve the query performance on both OLTP and OLAP queries.

Value Score

Optional value: 1~5

  • 3

Workload Estimation

Workload contains coding, documenting, and testing.
1 Point for 1 Person/Work Day

  • 90 Points
@zz-jason zz-jason added type/feature-request Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. type/performance sig/execution SIG execution sig/planner SIG: Planner labels May 28, 2020
@scsldb scsldb added the priority/P2 The issue has P2 priority. label Jun 15, 2020
@zz-jason
Copy link
Member Author

zz-jason commented Jul 7, 2020

#18030 is going to support geo-partition for partition tables. IMO, we'd better higher the priority of this issue for these reasons:


Updated in 2020-07-10

From #18016, partition pruning and data access performance are P0 tasks.

@zz-jason zz-jason added the feature/accepted This feature request is accepted by product managers label Jul 29, 2020
@zz-jason
Copy link
Member Author

close since all the issue except for #16845 listed in the doc are fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature/accepted This feature request is accepted by product managers invalid priority/P2 The issue has P2 priority. sig/execution SIG execution sig/planner SIG: Planner type/feature-request Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. type/performance
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants