Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support pipectl version control with asdf #4076

Closed
stormcat24 opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4185
Closed

Support pipectl version control with asdf #4076

stormcat24 opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4185
Assignees
Labels
area/pipectl kind/enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@stormcat24
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like to be added:

Currently, the pipectl installation method is traditional a little.
https://pipecd.dev/docs/user-guide/command-line-tool/

In cloud native, kubectl, helm, gcloud and eksctl have plugins for installing with asdf.
https://github.com/asdf-vm/asdf-plugins/tree/master/plugins

Why is this needed:
In order to increase the number of users of PipeCD, collaboration with popular ecosystems is very beneficial.
However, this idea is not a high priority 😎

@stormcat24 stormcat24 added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Dec 14, 2022
@khanhtc1202
Copy link
Member

Nice point, will add it to our pocket soon 👍

@funera1 funera1 self-assigned this Jan 27, 2023
@funera1
Copy link
Member

funera1 commented Feb 2, 2023

Created a Pull Request to be added to asdf.

@funera1
Copy link
Member

funera1 commented Feb 14, 2023

The pull request has been merged.

@stormcat24
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have verified that it works. Great 👍

$ asdf install pipectl latest
* Downloading pipectl release 0.41.4...
pipectl 0.41.4 installation was successful!

Users need documentation for this installation method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/pipectl kind/enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants