Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Properly handle SDL2 #270

Open
probonopd opened this issue Dec 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Properly handle SDL2 #270

probonopd opened this issue Dec 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@probonopd
Copy link
Owner

libSDL2 apparently needs many libraries that it does not declare as dependencies in a way that ldd understands.

Reference

@probonopd
Copy link
Owner Author

probonopd commented Dec 22, 2023

So possible we should patch those into libSDL2-2.0.so.0 with patchelf --add-needed so that they get properly deployed?

@stsp
Copy link

stsp commented Dec 24, 2023

I am still more than confident this
should be solved on an APK level.
Find sdl2 deps on ubuntu or by some
other means, and add them to the
apk metadata.
Don't go for binary patching or any
other weird things, that's what I think.

@probonopd
Copy link
Owner Author

probonopd commented Dec 30, 2023

Hi @stsp, what do you mean by "APK level"? As a cross-distro toolset, go-appimage doesn't even know what APK is.

@stsp
Copy link

stsp commented Dec 30, 2023

The problemis that in alpine the
sdl2 deps are missing. This means
you can't get a working dosemu2
there at all, no matter the appimage.
Solve this first, get the working alpine
build, then just wrap it to appimage
entirely.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants