Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Time to release 2.7.2? #564

Closed
underyx opened this issue Jun 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Time to release 2.7.2? #564

underyx opened this issue Jun 8, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@underyx
Copy link

underyx commented Jun 8, 2017

We didn't want to be pushy, but #410 was fixed over two months ago. Since then, we're still getting unknown error exceptions around once a week on average. We're too scared to install psycopg2 from a commit hash on master so we're just praying that there's nothing important behind these errors. Is there any chance that fix could make it into an official release? 😇

@dvarrazzo
Copy link
Member

Yes, was thinking about that. There's a handful of issues currently open though, and I was hoping to nail a problem in logical replication, but has happened only a couple of times in one month so I'm not holding my breath for that.

I've reviewed the state of the bug tracker: this is the list of issues I'd like to close to release 2.7.2. One is doc. One is maybe. Two are thorny.

Thank you for the gentle push: helping with the open issues would be welcome. I'll do my best to work on them in the next days but I'm in a busy period with $PAYING_JOB so psycopg may have to wait.

@dvarrazzo
Copy link
Member

#557 is the last guy open. It is a badass bug, and after seeing what happened with #551 I wouldn't even be so surprised if that is tickling some Py 3.6 interpreter bug. Anyway, closing this ticket: the nudge has been received ok and psycopg 2.7.2 is on its way to be released (compatibly with my available time).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants