Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement FullMode upgrade testing #36

Open
t0yv0 opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Implement FullMode upgrade testing #36

t0yv0 opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user kind/enhancement Improvements or new features

Comments

@t0yv0
Copy link
Member

t0yv0 commented Dec 5, 2023

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

We are mostly using PreviewOnly mode in practice but it is insufficient to test some scenarios. We need the option to run the slower but full fidelity mode that performs the provider upgrade without shortcuts.

For example pulumi/pulumi-aws#3091 - users are experiencing a panic but this panic only shows up in Update on an actual pulumi up and currently there's not enough support here in providertest to fully reproduce this.

Affected area/feature
@t0yv0 t0yv0 added kind/enhancement Improvements or new features needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team labels Dec 5, 2023
@t0yv0 t0yv0 mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2023
Open
@mjeffryes mjeffryes added kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user and removed needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team labels Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@t0yv0 @mjeffryes