Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

url mask for RegionNetworkEndpointGroupServerlessDeployment should be optional #798

Closed
knowhoper opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
awaiting-upstream The issue cannot be resolved without action in another repository (may be owned by Pulumi). kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec

Comments

@knowhoper
Copy link

What happened?

A feature in the terraform provider isn't supported

Steps to reproduce

Go here: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11242

Expected Behavior

URL Mask should be optional

Actual Behavior

URL mask is mandatory

Versions used

No response

Additional context

No response

Contributing

Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction.
To contribute a fix for this issue, leave a comment (and link to your pull request, if you've opened one already).

@knowhoper knowhoper added the kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec label Apr 22, 2022
@stack72 stack72 added the awaiting-upstream The issue cannot be resolved without action in another repository (may be owned by Pulumi). label Apr 27, 2022
@stack72 stack72 self-assigned this Apr 27, 2022
@knowhoper
Copy link
Author

@Narrayahodeir
Copy link

Narrayahodeir commented Apr 29, 2022

Works now with the release v6.21.0 but there is another issue when creating a resource without the urlMask property: #804

@knowhoper
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the update! Hopefully resolved soon🤞

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-upstream The issue cannot be resolved without action in another repository (may be owned by Pulumi). kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants