You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As per patsy's documentation, the following results in a design matrix with no intercept:
>>>patsy.dmatrix('a + b - 1',
pandas.DataFrame({'a':[1,2], 'b':[3,4]}))
DesignMatrix with shape (2, 2)
a b
1 3
2 4
Terms:
'a' (column 0), 'b' (column 1)
The documentation seems to imply that appending + -1 to the formula a + b should have the same effect as appending '-1'; however, it doesn't seem that the intercept is removed for the former:
>>>patsy.dmatrix('a + b + -1',
pandas.DataFrame({'a':[1,2],'b':[3,4]}))
DesignMatrix with shape (2, 3)
Intercept a b
1 1 3
1 2 4
Terms:
'Intercept' (column 0)
'a' (column 1)
'b' (column 2)
Is the above expected?
I'm using patsy 0.5.1 with python 3.7.6 and pandas 1.0.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for reporting this @lebedov. This does look like a bug, and despite the feature freeze, probably one worth patching. I'll look into it when I get a chance.
Note that this works in patsy's upcoming successor Formulaic as expected:
from formulaic import Formula
Formula('a + b + -1') # Outputs: a + b
As per patsy's documentation, the following results in a design matrix with no intercept:
The documentation seems to imply that appending
+ -1
to the formulaa + b
should have the same effect as appending '-1'; however, it doesn't seem that the intercept is removed for the former:Is the above expected?
I'm using patsy 0.5.1 with python 3.7.6 and pandas 1.0.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: