New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

correctly implement secp256k1's prime field #5

Open

q9f opened this issue Dec 20, 2019 · 0 comments

Owner

q9f commented Dec 20, 2019

It’s easier and more correct to implement secp256k1’s prime field
Then you don’t have to worry about doing the operations modulo the order
You just perform them all on the finite field
It’s like a nice logical building block

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment