You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The "Current scenario" view in ETEngine shows a number of specifications about scenarios: the future inputs, some generic attributes (area, end year etc.) and inputs present. When I click "Edit scenario", some additional information becomes visible: the forecast storage order and the heat network dispatchables order.
The question is whether the "Current scenario" view can be expanded on two points:
Main point: show which curves have been adjusted by users and with which curves they are overwritten, possibly allowing to download the curves
Optional: show the merit orders in the "Current scenario" view and not only in the "Edit scenario" view
@noracato@thomas-qah what do you think about this idea? When we decided to pursue this potential enhancement we should have a discussion on how and what we want to show exactly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would be no problem to add this, all the information is already there. I even find it a bit surprising that that's not in there yet. So, yes, I like this idea!
This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.
mabijkerk
added
Pinned
Will never be marked as stale or auto-closed.
and removed
Stale
Issue had no activity for 60 days and will be, or has been, closed.
labels
Oct 3, 2023
Building on #1348
The "Current scenario" view in ETEngine shows a number of specifications about scenarios: the future inputs, some generic attributes (area, end year etc.) and inputs present. When I click "Edit scenario", some additional information becomes visible: the forecast storage order and the heat network dispatchables order.
The question is whether the "Current scenario" view can be expanded on two points:
@noracato @thomas-qah what do you think about this idea? When we decided to pursue this potential enhancement we should have a discussion on how and what we want to show exactly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: