Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with data.table (see vignette) #154

Closed
TimTaylor opened this issue Feb 15, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Compatibility with data.table (see vignette) #154

TimTaylor opened this issue Feb 15, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@TimTaylor
Copy link

TimTaylor commented Feb 15, 2021

Do you mind keeping an issue open re: compatibility with {data.table} (summarised in the FAQ vignette)? Also are you aware if there is any relevant issue open their end that could be linked (I've seen multiple discussions re POSIXlt but could not find anything obvious about record types more generally).

I'm currently implementing a lot of s3 classes for year-weeks, year-months, year-quarters and think it would be better to rely {clock} but unfortunately I'm using data.table for the speed up it brings so hoping something eventually works out 🤞

@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Member

I've added an issue explaining the general concept of record types to data.table's repo. I'd prefer not to have outstanding issues that are related to something that I don't think clock can solve, so I'm going to close this one Rdatatable/data.table#4910

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants