handling PEP668 better ("break-system-packages") #63
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another Pull-Request from me regarding the procServUtils...
it fixes an oversight in my #60 PR:
python and corresponding pip versions below 3.11 fail to install procServUtils because they dont know the option
--break-system-packagesthus, I switched the logic to an environment variable
PIP_BREAK_SYSTEM_PACKAGES=1.it gets ignored by the old versions and the newer ones still allow installation of the package.
thanks for merging ;)