Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[master] feat: bump harvester-cloud-provider to v0.2.6 #6666

Merged

Conversation

FrankYang0529
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

Bump Harvester Cloud Provider v0.2.6

Types of Changes

Verification

Testing

Linked Issues

User-Facing Change


Further Comments

@FrankYang0529 FrankYang0529 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 30, 2024 01:55
@FrankYang0529 FrankYang0529 changed the title feat: bump harvester-cloud-provider to v0.2.6 [master] feat: bump harvester-cloud-provider to v0.2.6 Aug 30, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.18%. Comparing base (e4de10b) to head (edd19f0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6666   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   25.18%   25.18%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines        2831     2831           
=======================================
  Hits          713      713           
  Misses       2071     2071           
  Partials       47       47           
Flag Coverage Δ
inttests 9.57% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@brandond brandond merged commit b01b060 into rancher:master Sep 3, 2024
7 checks passed
@FrankYang0529 FrankYang0529 deleted the bump-harvester-cloud-provider-v0.2.6 branch September 4, 2024 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants