-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
yes / no abstain questions - board, secretary, members #34
Comments
Let's not presume the zulip chat approach... We also have the "send dust to an address representing your choice" design (#29 from @leithaus) which is reasonably clear: the board would decide questions and answers; the secretary would choose an address for each member and send the ballot to the membership. |
Note the rough timeline from Apr 7 cfdfb3c September 1st - call for BODs nominee & IOBs When does the ballot go out to the membership? When are votes due? |
In current version of <https://rv2020-m3.netlify.app/ballot.html > (rchain-community/rnode-client-js@cf615f0), I went from multiple choice to yes/no questions. But I'm representing "no" as absence of a transfer, which leaves no way to express "I want to change my vote from yes to no". Not only that, but @jimscarver notes the bylaws require a withhold option:
|
a9b5607 * explicit oppose (aka withold); no / abstain / yes in columns |
@ian-bloom I'm interested in your feedback on this design from the perspective of the secretary. The way I have been putting the agenda questions on chain is
We're not ready for your feedback on tallying votes yet; stay tuned to #35 for that. |
I like this approach a lot and will review it with Lilia, the current Co-op Secretary. |
Using https://jsoneditoronline.org/ in today's demo was cool, @ian-bloom . I aim to check in the instructions above as documentation. I was thinking of putting it in / near the README, but now I wonder if it belongs on a page in the app. hm. |
current design doesn't allow voters to express changing from yes to abstain, though the UI suggests they can. adding explicit rev address for abstaining impacts tallying design. ian: edge case... [pls send test case?] Rao: or a bot that sprays votes... yes, it seems worthwhile. |
@TheoXD and I added accounts for abstain vote in the SteveHenley-patch-1 branch since we are working together collaboratively and using vbcode live share. It reports abstains when votes are changed to abstain but is not initialized to abstains on everything by default yet. |
The ballot uri now needs to be updated in https://github.com/rchain-community/rv2020/blob/master/public/index.html We will also need to update the registered voter rev account set There there will by values for testnet and mainnet |
The board decides on the ballot of questions and the secretary sends them to the membership:
How would this work via zulip or the other methods?
How do members vote?
Related: how should members collaborate on proposing items of business?
(tally related checkboxes moved to #35 )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: