Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AV1 Encoding--CQP vs ICQ Mode #165

Open
wwaag76 opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

AV1 Encoding--CQP vs ICQ Mode #165

wwaag76 opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@wwaag76
Copy link

wwaag76 commented Aug 28, 2023

Just did some AV1 test encodes using CQP and ICQ modes with the same factor--28.
For ICQ, the resulting bit rate of the rendered file was 13 Mb/s which seems reasonable. However, for CQP mode, the bit rate was 63 Mb/s, roughly 5 times as large and more than twice the bit rate of the original file.
Is this correct? It would appear that CQP mode may be using 0-256 rather than 0-51.

@rigaya
Copy link
Owner

rigaya commented Aug 29, 2023

Yes, AV1 CQP range is 0 - 255.

@wwaag76
Copy link
Author

wwaag76 commented Sep 7, 2023

Thanks. One other question. What are the correct CQP and ICQ ranges for VP9?

@iccfish
Copy link

iccfish commented Sep 9, 2023

Thanks. One other question. What are the correct CQP and ICQ ranges for VP9?

Seems 0-51.

@Discograp
Copy link

Discograp commented Nov 5, 2023

for me

for VP9/AV1 from YouTube

CPU x265 with color range FULL encoded better and from GPU in terms of image quality and FPS (avisynth) Nvenc with color range FULL
and the Intel GPU turned out to be useful when activating TFF/BFF and VPP and VUI, without them it is useless

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants