-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
Things blocking or slowing progress of Ruma #189
Comments
This month, i have some task to do for the current term. Next i will try to implement, something like the dendrite room server style. |
I'm not sure if you are still actively working on ruma, but some of your issues seem to be resolved by now:
|
There's also https://gotham.rs/, based on |
Yes, the project is still active and we're still following developments of the things in the issue description. We're not likely to change the HTTP framework we use for a while longer, but keeping an eye on what's out there. |
I'm not sure about the future of |
Why not |
We may end up switching to any of the existing frameworks, or perhaps one that doesn't even exist yet. Things are still moving fast and it's too soon to tell. |
I think |
@jimmycuadra Are some of the matrix issues resolved with release of the S2S spec? |
Yes, I have updated the description at the top! Thanks. |
|
That is true, but the spirit of that line was more about deciding which framework to choose, which I think hinges more on async/await than use of the http crate at this point. I'll update the items to better reflect that. |
You can tick that off :-). |
Looks like matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#772 and matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#1468 were just closed today. |
I crossed off 1468 but 772 still might need another tweak. I left a comment there and am leaving it in our list for the moment. |
Triage: All of the The async/await MVP is stabilized in 1.39.0, but a host of other issues still remain to be resolved. Edit: The Hyper framework has initial support for async/await in 0.13alpha. |
and I expect web frameworks quickly livitate onto async/await now. Sounds exciting! |
It seems like the blocking list is close to being done, I'd love to help make a better matrix server. Just today the matrix.org synapse based homeservers are slooooow |
@BFrog The easiest way to contribute to the project right now is to contribute to ruma-client-api, which contains the Rust API definitions for the client-server protocol. Currently these are only used in ruma-client, our client library, but when homeserver development picks up again they will be used there too. See the issues section for a list of things that have to be done; also come join #ruma:matrix.org, where I and other people can help you get started. |
From the blocking list, the issue titled:
Seems to have been closed :3 |
@felix91gr See ruma/ruma#189 (comment) above. |
@jimmycuadra ohh, indeed. My bad! :) |
I'm creating this issue as a place to keep track of the things in the Rust and Matrix ecosystems that are completely blocking or slowing the progress of Ruma (the homeserver as well as supporting libraries.) We can use it to track the status of these blockers and as a place to link people wondering about the status of the project.
Rust (blocking implementation)
Release of http: blocks the use of these shared HTTP types being used in ruma-api, the integration of these types in hyper, and the integration of these types in downstream web frameworks we'd consider using, such as Gotham, Rocket, a renewed version of Iron, or something we build ourselves on HyperAdoption of the http crate in hyper (tracking issue): blocks adoption of an http-crate-based hyper in web frameworks we might want to useAdoption of the http crate in an async web framework: blocks our ability to use an http-crate-based ruma-api with said web frameworkStabilization of async/await (RFC 2033, tracking issue): blocks ergonomic use of async codeRust (blocking stabilization/release)
Stablization of impl Trait (RFC 1522, RFC 1951, and RFC 2071, tracking issue): blocks ergonomic, performant use of async code. Note: Part of impl Trait has been stabilized, but it's not yet usable in traits.Stabilization of theTryFrom
andTryInto
traits (RFC 1542, tracking issue): blocking stable use of fallible type conversions; used in several places in RumaStabilization of procedural macros (RFC 1566,tracking issue): blocking stabilization of ruma-api-macros, and in turn ruma-client-api, plus planned ruma-api crates like ruma-federation-api
Matrix (blocking implementation)
Client-server API specification r0.3.0 (or whatever the release after r0.2.0 ends up being): blocks some aspects of progress on the client-server API, notably end-to-end encryption supportA stable release of the server-server API specification: blocks ruma-federation-serverA stable release of the application service API specification: blocks future application services in Rust using Ruma librariesA stable release of the identity service API specification: blocks a future identity service in Rust using Ruma librariesA stable release of the push gateway API specification: blocks a future push gateway in Rust using Ruma librariesMatrix (blocking stabilization/release)
This is just a list of issues we've opened against the Matrix spec in the process of building Ruma. It includes places where things are wrong/misleading/undocumented. At least some of these are likely to be resolved in new versions of the specs listed above.
the GET form of /login has gone missing from swagger and spec/search spec says the only possible JSON body parameter issearch_categories
, but the example also hasorder_by
andgroupings
Spec does not explain the values of string keys in the /search's responseHandling the reason field in kick and ban endpointsEnumerate all events created when a room is createdExplain the rationale for /account/password authenticationsearch API lies and claims that it takes a v2 filterSpecify format of origin_server_tsSuperceded by:Timestamp time zone?Presence list API response does not match m.presence schemaStrippedState schema is inconsistentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: