Stage | Start Date | Release Date | Release Versions | Relevant Team(s) | RFC PR | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accepted |
2021-04-23 |
Unreleased |
|
ember-data |
Deprecates when a user directly imports a model extending @ember-data/model
and
attempts to access one of the static fields containing schema information about
attributes or relationships.
Schema descriptors on classes extending @ember-data/model
require walking the prototype
chain to collect inherited attributes and relationships. This isn't possible until an
EmberObject
's private proto
method has been invoked.
Externally, we feel accessing schema information in this manner is a bad practice that should
be avoided. Schema information is exposed at runtime via store.modelFor
in pre-
custom-model-class
versions and via the schema definition service and store-wrapper in post- custom-model-class
versions (3.28+).
Internally, the EmberData team wishes to explore removing our dependence on computed
properties and eachComputedProperty
which make use of invoking proto
for defining
schema (attr|belongsTo|hasMany
currently utilize these APIs to build out the schema information).
If we detect that an access has been made on a class not provided by a factory (the result of
calling modelFor
) we would print a deprecation targeting 5.0
that would become enabled
no-sooner than 4.1
(although it may be made available
before then).
Most usages of this pattern occur when a user imports a model for a unit test. In these cases the appropriate refactor to look it up via the store like so:
test('my test', async function(assert) {
const UserSchema = this.owner.lookup('service:store').modelFor('user');
let { attributes } = UserSchema; // access the map of attributes
});
Or if defining the model in the test file, first register the model like so:
test('my test', async function(assert) {
class User extends Model {
@attr name;
}
this.owner.register('model:user', User);
const UserSchema = this.owner.lookup('service:store').modelFor('user');
let { attributes } = UserSchema; // access the map of attributes
});
Generally this pattern has not been widely observed, though we should make sure that api-docs, guides, and blueprints are all updated to show the preferred pattern.
Potentially some churn if it turns out that lots of users rely on this sort of access, though
generally this is just another clear step away from EmberObject
and it better prepares these
users for accessing schema on models not built off of @ember-data/model
.
Ignore that this pattern exists, which seems risky given our momentum towards custom model
classes and potentially a different default model than @ember-data/model
.