diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 82fc703..2cc32e6 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -88,41 +88,6 @@ This is supported on Windows, macOS and Linux:
 
 See [`examples/google.rs`](examples/google.rs).
 
-# Should I use this or `webpki-roots`?
-
-(Background: [webpki-roots](https://crates.io/crates/webpki-roots) is a crate that compiles-in Mozilla's set of root certificates.)
-
-This crate is preferable in many ways to *webpki-roots*.
-To sum up the pros and cons:
-
-Pros:
-
-- **This crate respects local configuration of root certificates**: both
-  removal of roots that the user finds untrustworthy, and addition of locally-trusted roots.
-  _The latter case is exceedingly important if your application is required to work in
-  enterprise environments with "transparent" TLS-terminating middleboxes._
-- **This crate instantaneously reflects underlying system configuration**.  _Since webpki-roots
-  compiles in root certificates, getting an update to these requires taking regular updates
-  to this crate, plus recompilation and redeployment of the application.  This is a long-winded
-  process that may become a liability in the event of a severe misissuance._
-- **This crate is compatible with developer aids** such as [mkcert](https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert).
-
-Cons:
-
-- **Use of the OS certificate store is not the same as relying on OS trust verification**
-  because platform verifiers might impose additional criteria before deciding whether to trust
-  a root ostensibly included in the OS certificate store (for example, an expiration date).
-- **The OS certificate store is occasionally "attacked" by [malware](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfish)**
-  or just [bad software](https://sennheiser.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360011888254).
-- **The OS update system may, in fact, be quite poor at keeping the root certificates up-to-date**
-  if it is disabled or out-of-support.
-- **The quality of the `ca-certificates` package on debian-based Linux distributions is poor**.
-  At the time of writing, this ships many certificates not included in the Mozilla
-  set, either because they [failed an audit and were withdrawn](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1448506) or
-  [were removed for mississuance](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1552374).
-- **You may prefer to insulate yourself against local configuration** for support or
-  (perhaps inadvisable) security reasons.
-
 # License
 
 rustls-native-certs is distributed under the following three licenses: