Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make cunningham_tables-1.0.spkg standard and upgrade it #15813

Closed
rwst opened this issue Feb 13, 2014 · 16 comments
Closed

make cunningham_tables-1.0.spkg standard and upgrade it #15813

rwst opened this issue Feb 13, 2014 · 16 comments

Comments

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Feb 13, 2014

The optional spkg cunningham_tables-1.0 has no tickets, and is now available since sage-4.3.1. It is remarkably small.

According to #7240, it was voted to be included as standard. The newest version would be http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/roed/cunningham_tables-2.2.spkg

It however uses the obsolete SAGE_DATA, so a fixed version of the SPKG is attached. Also, in #7240 David Roe uploaded a patch that provides access to the tables. This is the first commit visible here. It however misses and changes some things.

Needed for #7240.

CC: @roed314

Component: packages: standard

Keywords: package, cunningham, factorization

Author: David Roe, Ralf Stephan

Branch/Commit: u/rws/ticket/15813 @ 7738db3

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15813

@rwst rwst added this to the sage-6.2 milestone Feb 13, 2014
@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Feb 13, 2014

Changed keywords from none to package, cunningham, factorization

@rwst

This comment has been minimized.

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Feb 21, 2014

Attachment: cunningham_tables-2.2.spkg.gz

David Roe's spkg with SAGE_DATA fix

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Feb 21, 2014

Author: David Roe, Ralf Stephan

@rwst

This comment has been minimized.

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Feb 21, 2014

Branch: u/rws/ticket/15813

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Feb 21, 2014

Commit: 7d1204f

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Feb 21, 2014

comment:5

I reverted David's unrelated changes to databases/install.py

@roed314: David, if you want to deprecate database_install() please open a separate ticket.


New commits:

391d5f5Trac #7240: update cunningham_tables package to version 2.2
7d1204fTrac #15813: add ref to databases/all.py; revert silent changes to install.py

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Mar 9, 2014

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

670fb1cMerge branch 'develop' into ticket/15813

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Mar 9, 2014

Changed commit from 7d1204f to 670fb1c

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Mar 12, 2014

Changed commit from 670fb1c to 7738db3

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Mar 12, 2014

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

7738db3Merge branch 'develop' into ticket/15813

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Apr 13, 2014

comment:8

We need a plain tarball (gz/bz2) for standard packages. David, can you make one?

@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented May 7, 2014

comment:10

Some problem when buiding in patchbot. Set flag again when tarball available.

@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Jan 15, 2018

comment:12

The package is now not even experimental. The spkg is no longer available. The issue is superseded by #12133 because the Brent database contained the Cunningham tables.

So this is a duplicate.

@rwst rwst removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Jan 15, 2018
@videlec
Copy link
Contributor

videlec commented May 18, 2018

comment:13

closing positively reviewed duplicates

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants