-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace generator_cmp by generator_key and generator_reverse #17229
Comments
Commit: |
Branch: u/aapitzsch/ticket/17229 |
comment:2
Hello,
This is not a comparison function (which would have pairs as input)! More to come, when you answer 1 Vincent |
comment:3
Replying to @videlec:
In Python 3 the |
comment:7
rebased on 7.2.rc2 New commits:
|
Changed branch from u/aapitzsch/ticket/17229 to public/17229 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:13
I just went through the diff, and it sounds reasonable (haven't checked the details though). Do we want to use the occasion to find better names for the options? Tiny detail:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:17
After a discussion with Nicolas, we decided to use |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
comment:18
There should be a comma or a dot somewhere in the sentence
|
comment:20
ok, looks almost good to me. in the example
one should use instead the new Maybe also we should avoid using |
Changed reviewer from Travis Scrimshaw to Travis Scrimshaw, Frédéric Chapoton |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:22
I decided to deprecate that function since it will be going away. However, because of how module morphism currently works, I had to write a small lambda function (which will vanish once we change this behavior in |
Changed keywords from none to days74 |
comment:24
ok, looks good to me |
comment:25
Thank you! |
Changed branch from public/17229 to |
Deprecate the print option
generator_cmp
in favour ofsorting_key
andsorting_reverse
.This is part of #16536.
CC: @sagetrac-sage-combinat @nthiery @tscrim
Component: python3
Keywords: days74
Author: André Apitzsch
Branch/Commit:
42658f1
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw, Frédéric Chapoton
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17229
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: