-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve introspection capabilities of Sage Jupyter Kernel #25015
Comments
comment:2
Related issue for CoCalc: sagemathinc/cocalc#2764 I'll implement something compatible with what you do here... |
comment:4
I should add, that while I assigned myself this task OpenDreamKit is currently hiring for a position (we're actually interviewing candidates today) under which this work could very likely fall as well. So depending on how things go I might point someone else in the right direction to work on this... |
comment:9
Really mostly what this has to do with is ensuring that So we would need a way to find which page in the HTML docs contains the API documentation for that object, and return the HTML for that page (and specifically the section for that object) to Jupyter. This would involve modifying what the Sage Jupyter kernel returns in response to inspect_request messages. Right now we just return a The one thing I'm less sure about is the best way to format the HTML. Would it make sense to extract HTML from Sage's HTML docs (but in this case we also need to ensure that all the relevant stylesheets, javascript, etc. are loaded). Or do we do something like an |
comment:10
The system with the legacy Sage notebook is to run |
comment:11
I don't have an informed opinion for how to proceed. Thank you for pushing this forward! |
comment:12
Retargeting some of my tickets. |
comment:13
Removing most of the rest of my open tickets out of the 8.7 milestone, which should be closed. |
comment:14
Finally have some progress on a working prototype of this (something I just felt compelled to work on today). It turns out to be much more challenging that I originally expected :( It turns out that the
In other words, So the trick is the actually override how the On top of all that it requires a little more hacking to get the math displayed right. My prototype mostly works now, save for also loading the necessary CSS for the HTML docs to be displayed better. Here's a screenshot showing an example of the in-progress work: As you can see, one of the main problems is a lack of margins between paragraphs. Not shown in the screenshot, but code highlighting in the examples is broken. This is all due to not having the standard CSS load. Some non-standard LaTeX macros probably won't render either, though this is a more general problem with have right now in the Jupyter notebook. |
Author: Erik Bray |
Branch: u/embray/ticket-25015 |
comment:15
Attachment: ticket-25015.png Here's the in-progress version if anyone wants to try it out. New commits:
|
Commit: |
comment:16
Another shortcoming I noticed is that It would be nice if this could instead produce an actual link. Perhaps that should be tackled as a separate issue though. |
comment:17
Waouh! I've just checked it and it looks already very nice, even without the code highlighting in the doctests. Other shortcomings one might notice:
Anyway, all the above seem very minor inconveniences in perspective of the current state, which is ASCII-only documentation. So IMHO we could adopt your "prototype" as is and leave further improvements for other tickets. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:18
Thank you for testing it out! I think fixing some of these issues is going to require new features in a Jupyter extension, in particular to load the JavaScript and CSS necessary fo fix some of those issues. The double math-rendering thing is odd. It might be related also this upstream issue I opened. It hasn't gotten any notice yet though. Maybe it will get more if I go ahead and make a PR to propose a fix... |
comment:19
Replying to @egourgoulhon:
By the way: This is a problem in the Jupyter notebook in general. Try making a text cell including them--they won't render properly there either, at least in my experience. In SageNB, as well as in the Sphinx docs, we manually define these macros from: def latex_extra_preamble():
r"""
Return the string containing the user-configured preamble,
``sage_latex_macros``, and any user-configured macros. This is
used in the :meth:`~Latex.eval` method for the :class:`Latex`
class, and in :func:`_latex_file_`; it follows either
``LATEX_HEADER`` or ``SLIDE_HEADER`` (defined at the top of this
file) which is a string containing the documentclass and standard
usepackage commands.
EXAMPLES::
sage: from sage.misc.latex import latex_extra_preamble
sage: print(latex_extra_preamble())
<BLANKLINE>
\newcommand{\ZZ}{\Bold{Z}}
\newcommand{\NN}{\Bold{N}}
\newcommand{\RR}{\Bold{R}}
\newcommand{\CC}{\Bold{C}}
\newcommand{\QQ}{\Bold{Q}}
\newcommand{\QQbar}{\overline{\QQ}}
\newcommand{\GF}[1]{\Bold{F}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Zp}[1]{\Bold{Z}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Qp}[1]{\Bold{Q}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\Zmod}[1]{\ZZ/#1\ZZ}
\newcommand{\CDF}{\Bold{C}}
\newcommand{\CIF}{\Bold{C}}
\newcommand{\CLF}{\Bold{C}}
\newcommand{\RDF}{\Bold{R}}
\newcommand{\RIF}{\Bold{I} \Bold{R}}
\newcommand{\RLF}{\Bold{R}}
\newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
<BLANKLINE>
"""
from sage.misc.latex_macros import sage_latex_macros
return "\n".join([_Latex_prefs._option['preamble'],
"\n".join(sage_latex_macros()),
_Latex_prefs._option['macros']]) Somehow we need to have the Sage Jupyter Notebook extension output some JavaScript to define these in MathJax. I'm not really sure how that works though. Someone with more experience with both Juypter Extensions and MathJax should chime in on that... |
comment:20
Tiny side note:
For what it is worth, these macros work in our implementation of Jupyter (for CoCalc), with any kernel. Also, we use KaTeX by default, which is faster for math rendering. In addition, we cache rendering, so if you render the same formula again, it's much faster. It might be easier just to get a PR into Jupyter that predefines some useful latex macros. You would also want to support nbconvert. |
comment:21
These macros are defined in |
comment:22
A few elements about Sphinx code highlighting:
from builders/html.py
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/_static/pygments.css |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:24
I see; we probably don't want to rely on the full HTML docs being built/installed in order to load this stylesheet in the Jupyter kernel though; I'll look at that New commits:
|
comment:25
May I ask about the status of this? It would be so nice to have it in the Sage 9.0 release. Even if it is not fully perfect, it is much much better than having the pure ASCII documentation in Jupyter notebooks... |
comment:26
I haven't had time to work on it so if someone would like to take it over they are welcome to. I think improving some of the CSS stuff should still be done. Since this might render some documentation less legible (e.g. due to the CSS or latex issues) it might be good to have a global function in Sage to enable/disable this (but it could be enabled by default in most cases I think...) |
Originally from https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/8qr20g0EM5c/U9Kug99SBQAJ
Currently introspecting Sage objects in Jupyter (either the IPython console or the Notebook) with the
obj?
syntax is little different from the standard Pythonhelp(obj)
output.In particular on the Notebook this is not great because it means equations are not rendered--this is a major deficiency compared to SageNB.
The interface for Jupyter kernels does allow customizing what is sent back to the client upon object introspection. My understanding is that this can send back a multi-part MIME message in multiple formats (e.g. plain text and HTML) and the client will pick the most appropriate format to display. So on the Notebook, for example, it will prefer HTML-formatted help if any.
In this case the thing to do might be to look up the appropriate page for an object in Sage's reference docs, and return the HTML for that object, taking care to make sure that MathJax rendering is applied, and any images returned as well. I'm not exactly sure about the details of making this work yet (images, for example, might have to be embedded as base64).
Relevant upstream issues:
Part of #29889.
CC: @egourgoulhon @zerline
Component: documentation
Author: Erik Bray
Branch/Commit: [uhttps://user-images.githubusercontent.com/676149/216875645-789923ad-e325-42ea-9fbe-37b055e6063c.png) @
ec1e13a
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25015
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: