You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Let me begin by saying that I was a casual cube rule enjoyer until a coworker brought the salad theory up to me. I'm willing to convert, but I have one issue. One of your criticisms of the cube rule is that it has problems with bites being taken out of food that result in the definition changing. I agree that that is a problem, but you also have a problem with foods being reclassified, without a bite being taken. By your guidance, a glass of coke with ice in it is a salad. If I leave for a few hours and return to find that all the ice has melted, is my coke no longer a salad? I find this to be deeply troublesome, and I would urge you to revise your approach.
I think the problem is that ice is being considered an ingredient unique from water. If you believe that microwaving a caesar salad should not exclude it from being a salad, then freezing water and putting in water should not upgrade it into a low-entropy hyper-salad (temporarily). Ice and water are one ingredient, at different temperatures. This then pushes into a new territory - a glass of coke has multiple ingredients, including water. Do you consider a glass of coke a salad? If the answer is no, then all homogenous soups (fully blended with no heterogeneity) cannot be classified as salads. I propose that, from here, the solution is somewhere in arrangement entropy. While a salad can be mixed and rotate in any number of axes, a beverage or a soup does not have any meaningful ability to be mixed. Consider a blended tomato soup, a glass of coke, or a bowl of jello. None of these ought to be salads in my opinion, I think they all should be at a soupiness factor of 1 and be called strictly soup. Soup-Salad duality addresses this by saying that there is a "possible exception of the boundaries (foods which have a soupiness of exactly 0 or 1)".
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Likewise, if I take a green salad (anything leafy green usually put into salads, i.e. lettuce, rocket), and leave it a few days, it'll turn into compost. Is that no longer a salad? Or, by implication of your theorem (leaving a salad should not change it's salad-ness), that a green salad was never a salad in the first place?
Compost is not in the realm of food anymore, I don't think that applies? I'm only getting at the fact that a phase change should not count as a new ingredient, especially if the phase change is unstable like ice.
Let me begin by saying that I was a casual cube rule enjoyer until a coworker brought the salad theory up to me. I'm willing to convert, but I have one issue. One of your criticisms of the cube rule is that it has problems with bites being taken out of food that result in the definition changing. I agree that that is a problem, but you also have a problem with foods being reclassified, without a bite being taken. By your guidance, a glass of coke with ice in it is a salad. If I leave for a few hours and return to find that all the ice has melted, is my coke no longer a salad? I find this to be deeply troublesome, and I would urge you to revise your approach.
I think the problem is that ice is being considered an ingredient unique from water. If you believe that microwaving a caesar salad should not exclude it from being a salad, then freezing water and putting in water should not upgrade it into a low-entropy hyper-salad (temporarily). Ice and water are one ingredient, at different temperatures. This then pushes into a new territory - a glass of coke has multiple ingredients, including water. Do you consider a glass of coke a salad? If the answer is no, then all homogenous soups (fully blended with no heterogeneity) cannot be classified as salads. I propose that, from here, the solution is somewhere in arrangement entropy. While a salad can be mixed and rotate in any number of axes, a beverage or a soup does not have any meaningful ability to be mixed. Consider a blended tomato soup, a glass of coke, or a bowl of jello. None of these ought to be salads in my opinion, I think they all should be at a soupiness factor of 1 and be called strictly soup. Soup-Salad duality addresses this by saying that there is a "possible exception of the boundaries (foods which have a soupiness of exactly 0 or 1)".
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: