-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
htslib in pysam.fetch on S3 Bucket #1670
Comments
That looks unfortunate. We'll investigate and see if we can make these requests less open-ended. It may need a bit of rework to how our http requests work though so I can't be sure how long it will take. |
Thx, initially I used pysam.fetch which created the problematic open end requests. |
I checked the requests from Samtools view, they are also open and will create inflated egress costs. |
Hi @StephanHolgerD , did pysam.view end up producing clean range requests? I wonder if you would be able to share some code for how you implemented it as I am looking for a similar functionality and haven't found an easy solution! |
@apena23 hey, sorry for the late reply. I did not get clean range requesta using the htslib. Currently working on an implementation in Python |
Hi, I want to report a potentially problematic behaviour using pysam.fetch on AWS S3 bucket infrastructure. Using the following pseudo code on a Bam file in a S3 Bucket will create requests without a defined end range.
Code
with pysam.AlignmentFile(bamfile_S3,filepath_index=baifile_S3) as f:
for r in f.fetch(chrom,start,end):
Request
This kind of 'open' request results in high egress costs because aws logs the whole file after the start byte as delivered, even if you stop reading the data at the end of your fetch coordinates.
Compared to the requests from IGV on S3 data (low egress costs, only the exact byte range is logged)
Request
Initially I reported this here:
pysam-developers/pysam#1215
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: