-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JD.1.1 (XBB.1.5.102 + FLip, S:A475V) Sublineage with S:T470N (10 sequences, 2 countries) #896
Comments
If there's something with S:470 and S:475 we will see that in GK.3.1/GK.4/GW.5.1.1/FL.15.1.1 in a few weeks. Really suggest to use another AA-query. |
S.T470N was in Sars1 |
ping @corneliusroemer i suggest rapid designation here. |
@ryhisner i think there are 8 not nine. |
Which one of the EPI_ISL's do you think doesn't belong? There appear to be nine on the Usher tree. One of them doesn't have ORF6:N26D or ORF1a:V1584M. Maybe we shouldn't count the coinfection/contamination one? EPI_ISL_18147899, EPI_ISL_18220202, EPI_ISL_18244938, EPI_ISL_18280964, EPI_ISL_18295837, EPI_ISL_18295898, EPI_ISL_18313958, EPI_ISL_18327415, EPI_ISL_18329981 |
the query gave 8 and miscounted on usher the french seqs sorry. so the query loses one. |
I think C22971A, T28282C works just as well and also catches the French sequence, so I've changed the query. |
Thank you! |
+1 Italy |
There seems to be homoplasy at 470N: currently, the Usher tree suggests one single event of 470N, but there are two branches with 2 private muts each and the smaller one has T16593C for which there are 2 basal French sequences, suggesting that 470N arose independently
Designated JD.1.1.3 via cov-lineages/pango-designation@ec1bf5f |
Description
Sub-lineage of: JD.1.1
Earliest sequence: 2023-8-14, France — EPI_ISL_18220202
Most recent sequence: 2023-9-18, France — EPI_ISL_18327415
Countries circulating: France (8), Denmark (1)
Number of Sequences: 9
GISAID Nucleotide Query: C22971A, T28282C
CovSpectrum Query: Nextcladepangolineage:XBB.1.5* & C22986T & C22971A & [2-of: C14189T, C19158T, T28282C, C28087T]
Substitutions on top of JD.1.1:
Spike: T470N
Nucleotide: C19158T, C22971A ( C22971A, T28282C,C14189T to exclude old indian sequence but loses one of this)
Phylogenetic Order of Mutations: C19158T → C22971A (S:T470N)
USHER Tree
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/raw.githubusercontent.com/ryhisner/jsons/main/JD.1.1_T470N_France_9_seq.json?c=gt-S_470&gmax=25384&gmin=21563&label=id:node_3886280
Evidence
Despite there being only nine sequences, this has been detected in six different regions of France and Denmark. One of the most recent sequences appears to be a recombinant with EG.5.1. However, the presence of ORF1a:V1584M (in 8/9 sequences in this lineage) and the lack of ORF1a:T4175I (in EG.5.1) means this would need to have at least five breakpoints, two on either side of both ORF1a:V1584M and ORF1a:T4175I and one between S:52 and S:470. So it seems likely this is either coinfection or contamination.
Genomes
Genomes
EPI_ISL_18147899, EPI_ISL_18220202, EPI_ISL_18244938, EPI_ISL_18280964, EPI_ISL_18295837, EPI_ISL_18295898, EPI_ISL_18313958, EPI_ISL_18327415, EPI_ISL_18329981The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: