You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @blahah, I really like the look of science-fair, looking forward to more datasources being available.
I was reading the source code, and looking at how the project is built, really nice model-view design with choo which is a very nice functional way of building the thing - much nicer on my brain than a more heavyweight framework!! 😆
Anyway I was wondering what I might be able to contribute to this project if I wanted to do some weekend programming fun, and it occured to me it would be awesome if scienfair allowed bibtex and other bibliography management for the papers people are downloading and sharing with sciencefair.
There are several ways this might be done of course, but was wondering what your thoughts were on this. Firstly is it desirable to you? And secondly are there ways you'd like to see such a thing implemented or even ways you definately wouldn't want to see it implemented?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @blahah, I really like the look of science-fair, looking forward to more datasources being available.
I was reading the source code, and looking at how the project is built, really nice model-view design with choo which is a very nice functional way of building the thing - much nicer on my brain than a more heavyweight framework!! 😆
Anyway I was wondering what I might be able to contribute to this project if I wanted to do some weekend programming fun, and it occured to me it would be awesome if scienfair allowed bibtex and other bibliography management for the papers people are downloading and sharing with sciencefair.
There are several ways this might be done of course, but was wondering what your thoughts were on this. Firstly is it desirable to you? And secondly are there ways you'd like to see such a thing implemented or even ways you definately wouldn't want to see it implemented?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: