You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it make sense to, for calibrate_model, if an initial parameter guess (p0) is not provided, simply randomly select one from within the bounds (and priors) of the parameters? It feels like this will typically be a random value, in which case providing functionality for it might be good.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm, I am against this, as I would like calibrate_model to mimic most available optimizers that all require a start-guess to be generated.
But it would be nice to to have functionality for start-guesses, so maybe a good solution would be to export the generate_startguesses function, and make it return a vector in case the user only wants 1 start-guess?
Would it make sense to, for
calibrate_model
, if an initial parameter guess (p0
) is not provided, simply randomly select one from within the bounds (and priors) of the parameters? It feels like this will typically be a random value, in which case providing functionality for it might be good.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: