Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Take the union of GN / VL parsing and geocoding set from BioSamples #8

Open
ababaian opened this issue Mar 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@ababaian
Copy link
Member

We have two datasets that have "passed" over the BioSample XML files, there are some discrepancies between them, we should take the union of the parsed coordinates.

Set 1: VL geocoded_all is on the SQL server.

Set 2: GN df_final_lat_lon.csv which is the product of some manual labour. Download from S3: s3://serratus-public/tmp/df_final_lat_lon.csv

@victorlin
Copy link
Member

victorlin commented Mar 12, 2021

VL visual:
geocoded_all

GN visual:
planetary_seq

Noticable differences in the marinal points.

@ababaian
Copy link
Member Author

Intersection between the GN and VL sets:

> length(VL)
[1] 2534331
> length(which(VL %in% GN))
[1] 1748525
> length(VL) - length(which(VL %in% GN))
[1] 785806
> length(GN)
[1] 1478818
> length(which(GN %in% VL))
[1] 1465216
> length(GN) - length(which(GN %in% VL))
[1] 13602

When I plot your geocoded data, it gives me the same plot as above, it looks like the difference is things are missing from the plotting in the geocoded_all dataset, but the data is there?

Screenshot from 2021-03-12 23-09-03

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants