Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should IOSurface be a part of core-graphics-types? #483

Open
kvark opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Should IOSurface be a part of core-graphics-types? #483

kvark opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@kvark
Copy link
Member

kvark commented Dec 2, 2021

Similar to #479, but for IOSurface.
Triggered by gfx-rs/metal-rs#223
io-surface crate has a whole lot of dependencies, and we just need an IOSurfaceRef.

@jrmuizel
Copy link
Collaborator

jrmuizel commented Dec 2, 2021

How about something like #484 instead? That reduces io-surface's dependencies to the same as core-graphics-types

@kvark
Copy link
Member Author

kvark commented Dec 2, 2021

You are suggesting this for io-surface crate? I don't think this would be a good solution, because it would still be breaking often (because each optional dependency can require breaking), so version on io-surface are still going to climb up faster than on metal-rs. I want metal-rs dependencies to be mostly set in stone in terms of compatibility.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants