Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release wasm + asm.js version on npm #27

Open
graingert opened this issue Sep 2, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

release wasm + asm.js version on npm #27

graingert opened this issue Sep 2, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@graingert
Copy link

No description provided.

@graingert graingert changed the title release wasm + esm.js version on npm release wasm + asm.js version on npm Sep 2, 2019
@UnlimitedCookies
Copy link

Deprecated: This feature is no longer recommended. Though some browsers might still support it, it may have already been removed from the relevant web standards, may be in the process of being dropped, or may only be kept for compatibility purposes. Avoid using it, and update existing code if possible; see the compatibility table at the bottom of this page to guide your decision. Be aware that this feature may cease to work at any time.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Games/Tools/asm.js?source=post_page

@graingert
Copy link
Author

Right but wasm is still supported

@samclaus
Copy link

Hi, what is the status on this? Is there anyway to compile this to a WebAssembly target that can be lazy-loaded to a page? I have heard Rust has excellent support for compiling to WASM but I do not know anything about the process--I feel like this version of ZXCVBN could easily surpass the vanilla JS ZXCVBN with a guide on how to do so. The library is big and the problem with the JS version as far as I can tell is that JS is just incredibly slow to parse (even though the library is mostly just data) which really hurts load times.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants