Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

is a no_std version of simdjson-rs feasible/desirable? #92

Open
4 tasks
sunnygleason opened this issue Jan 2, 2020 · 4 comments
Open
4 tasks

is a no_std version of simdjson-rs feasible/desirable? #92

sunnygleason opened this issue Jan 2, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request medium

Comments

@sunnygleason
Copy link
Member

sunnygleason commented Jan 2, 2020

Was reading some embedded rust articles over the break
which got me thinking about no_std. Does a no_std version
sound interesting? What are the key pieces we'd need to
compensate for in a no_std version?

@Licenser
Copy link
Member

Licenser commented Jan 2, 2020

That's an interesting idea! It's sure worth doing some research on what the requirements are :). Then again I'm not sure how many no_std projects run on x86* that's probably something to factor in, I suspect most of them would run on embedded platforms like arm (glad we got that :P) but that's pure gut feeling we'd probably should find that out runs to twitter

@Licenser Licenser added enhancement New feature or request medium labels Jan 2, 2020
@Licenser
Copy link
Member

Licenser commented Oct 9, 2023

Since there has very little (no) call for this in 3 years I'll close this issue

@Licenser Licenser closed this as completed Oct 9, 2023
@theoparis
Copy link

theoparis commented Nov 1, 2024

I am also interested in this - serde_json supports no_std. Can this issue be re-opened?

@Licenser
Copy link
Member

Licenser commented Nov 3, 2024

Sure

@Licenser Licenser reopened this Nov 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request medium
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants