-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
open source HW for SC quantum #71
Comments
The QICK thing is described in a paper too: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00557 We got a shout out. Wish we had a better citation than M-Labs website so we could get our citation points (=prizes!).
|
From a business perspective papers just don't have good ROI. |
Potential customers read the arXiv. |
Potential customers also watch cat videos and we're not making those. |
@dtcallcock I think if you want this paper, you are going to have to do the heavy lifting. I imagine that @jordens and @sbourdeauducq could be convinced to provide some technical content in specific areas where it is relevant, but all the other boilerplate has to be handled by someone else. Frankly I'd rather have them working on contracts I have with them rather than paper writing :) |
Today I had a chat with the Creotech guys. They are writing a lot of reports for the funding agencies. Just translate, make it short and publish. |
M-Labs is the new Elsevier. We have some preliminary code to run bare metal Rust on Ultrascale+/RFSoC. Can develop further and/or port ARTIQ if there is interest. |
We are finishing the design of the stand-alone RFSOC AWG + we already have a native CPCIS UltraScale carrier board manufactured. So there is an interest, at least from polish side :) |
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0055906
https://gitlab.com/LBL-QubiC/rfmixingmodules
https://github.com/openquantumhardware/qick
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: