Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk-dev] Fix for 2 vulnerabilities #987

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:

    • package.json
    • package-lock.json
  • Adding or updating a Snyk policy (.snyk) file; this file is required in order to apply Snyk vulnerability patches.
    Find out more.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With a Snyk patch:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Exploit Maturity
low severity 399/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:debug:20170905
No Known Exploit
low severity 399/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:ms:20170412
No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

@FauxFaux FauxFaux closed this Aug 17, 2021
This was referenced Sep 27, 2021
@SonyaMoisset SonyaMoisset deleted the snyk-fix-a193d836b2219f149ec62abb926257f9 branch July 11, 2022 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants