-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Add security disclosure policy #1194
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, and a good starting point. I'm approving but I'd suggest leaving this open for others to look at first :)
Question: Was this produced based on some existing security disclosure policy elsewhere? |
Yes, I looked at various ones (see included issue/discussion and document) and quite liked the Matrix one (lol) so it is very similar. https://matrix.org/security-disclosure-policy/ I'm not sure if it's worth mentionning that or having more differentiation? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love it, simple and to the point. LGTM.
Unrelated: How the heck did this effect the code coverage, are markdown files somehow included? |
P2P causes the code cov to bounce around a bit depending on the various concurrent elements that may or may not be hit on each test run. |
Relevant issue(s)
Resolves #1205
Description
Rendered
Introduces a security disclosure policy for DefraDB, and more generally for the organization. This policy or other variations could be useful for other D2 projects. The rationale can be found on this doc: https://source.almanac.io/docs/security-disclosure-policy-80d5eb85cef6441a85827db6ccce0772?docView=Editing
Additional action items for the organization:
Future tasks related to this will include:
How has this been tested?
Humans