Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PAPER: Matter (?) article for using CLSLabs-Light as a teaching and prototyping demo #217

Open
sgbaird opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@sgbaird
Copy link
Member

sgbaird commented Jul 12, 2023

Adaptive experimentation for the physical sciences: A more efficient alternative to design of experiments

Tutorials and templates for teaching advanced optimization and autonomous experimentation in the physical sciences

CLSLabs-Light: A low-cost self-driving laboratory for teaching autonomous experimentation topics in the physical sciences

CLSLabs-Light as a teaching and prototyping platform for advanced optimization and autonomous experimentation in the physical sciences

Artifacts:

  • Figure: Annotated CLSLabs:Light hardware and summary figures
  • Table: summary of tutorial notebooks
  • Table: summary of the basic, fidelity, batch, high-dimensional, (Olympus) category, and scalability results
  • Figure: a comparison between grid search, random search, and Bayesian optimization for experimental and simulated results
    • subfigures showing the search behavior as the optimization progresses
    • subfigure showing the solution space (mean and standard deviation)
  • Figure: Pareto front exploration behavior of qEHVI vs. scalarized objectives
  • Figure: efficiency comparison between single- and multi-fidelity (continuous) optimization
  • Figure: efficiency comparison between sequential vs. batch vs. asynchronous optimization
  • Figure: efficiency comparison between single- and multi-fidelity (discrete) optimization
  • Figure: efficiency comparison between high-dimensional Bayesian optimization and traditional Bayesian optimization
  • Figure: comparisons between Olympus benchmarking algorithms
  • Figure: flowchart for setting up and storing in a database, and later retrieval
  • Figure: flowchart for the use of experiment planning software
  • Figure: Runtime and efficiency comparison for scalable Bayesian optimization vs. traditional Bayesian optimization
  • Figure: Cloud control - MQTT communication between device and client
  • Figure: teaching figure for how the simulations are set up
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant