You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the inspector expects the GraphQLSchema and RuntimeWiring. This works fine for our purposes since we use RuntimeWiring to addDataFetcher registrations. However, instead of performing direct registrations, alternative GraphQlSource.Builder implementations may also use the GraphQLCodeRegistry in RuntimeWiring, or possibly not use RuntimeWiring at all.
To make the inspector more generally usable we could allow it to take a map of registrations, independent of how or whether RuntimeWiring is used. A map is suffiicent for the internal implementation, in which case the existing method taking RuntimeWiring would become a simple delegate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the inspector expects the
GraphQLSchema
andRuntimeWiring
. This works fine for our purposes since we useRuntimeWiring
to addDataFetcher
registrations. However, instead of performing direct registrations, alternativeGraphQlSource.Builder
implementations may also use theGraphQLCodeRegistry
inRuntimeWiring
, or possibly not useRuntimeWiring
at all.To make the inspector more generally usable we could allow it to take a map of registrations, independent of how or whether
RuntimeWiring
is used. A map is suffiicent for the internal implementation, in which case the existing method takingRuntimeWiring
would become a simple delegate.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: